Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
TDS Dump when running the script is attached.
Original comment by rsyr...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2011 at 6:46
Attachments:
ok, a little more info and a correction. When running the test script against
the distro's version of FreeTDS, I do not get a segfault. Instead, I get the
error:
pyodbc.Error: ('HY004', '[HY004] [FreeTDS][SQL Server]Invalid data type (0)
(SQLBindParameter)
When I run the pyodbc tests (sqlservertests.py) against 0.82, then I get a lot
of failures (output attached). When I run them against my compiled version of
freetds, they segfault.
Original comment by rsyr...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2011 at 4:19
Attachments:
(SQLBindParameter) error was fixed by using a freshly compiled version of
FreeTDS and setting ClientCharset=UTF-8 in the connection string. Doing that
makes the test script run without error.
However, pyodbc tests still segfault and I still get segfault problems when
running unit tests on a web application I built using SQLAlchemy.
Original comment by rsyr...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2011 at 6:05
Sorry for all the comments, I am continuing to try to figure this one out.
I was able to prevent my application's unit tests from crashing by changing all
my SQLAlchemy columns from String() to Unicode(). That lead me to be able to
come up with a test script that reproduces the problem (attached) based on
SQLAlchemy.
In my attempt to translate that code to pure pyodbc (the test script previously
attached), the error no longer shows up. However, I'm pretty confident the bug
is in pyodbc or freetds since pure python code shouldn't be able to crash
python.
FreeTDS guys suggested I run valgrind. So I did that:
valgrind --tool=memcheck -v --suppressions=valgrind-python.supp python
test_freetds_unicode.py 2>valgrind-out.txt
based on the files here:
http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Misc/README.valgrind
http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Misc/valgrind-python.supp (I
uncommented the parts they recommend uncommenting if you don't want to
re-compile python)
However, when I run with valgrind, I don't get a segfault anymore! Valgrind
output is attached anyway, not sure how helpful it will be.
Let me know if there is anything else I can to help.
Original comment by rsyr...@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2011 at 3:58
Attachments:
This is worrisome: Use of uninitialised value of size 8
However, it seems to show up a lot. Can you run valgrind on a simple Python
script without pyodbc to see if it also generates these errors. It might be an
error in the Python runtime:
class X(object): pass
x = X()
x.test = 1
del x
Original comment by mkleehammer
on 20 May 2011 at 7:36
Im getting this error when using Easysoft, not FreeTDS, drivers. Im getting
the ***glibc detected*** behavior on a fedora machine as well as an ubuntu
machine - on a remote machine being tested by a colleague, he is getting the
"Invalid data type (0) (SQLBindParameter)" error. I've never had this problem
with FreeTDS.
Original comment by zzz...@gmail.com
on 6 Jun 2011 at 7:36
I believe there is a bug in sqlwchar.cpp at line 154. I think it should be len
+ 1 because sqlwchar_copy() includes the trailing null.
Also, the freeTDS 0.91 release seems to fix a lot of unicode related issues.
Original comment by davidp.r...@gmail.com
on 7 Jun 2011 at 1:27
I am having this issue as well, and running original reporter's test_pyodbc.py
script results in same errors. Error occurs on two different systems:
1. Gentoo x64, python 2.6.6, unixodbc 2.3.0, freetds 0.83dev (from 2011-01-25),
pyodbc 2.1.8
2. Gentoo x64, python 2.7.1, unixodbc 2.3.0, freetds 0.91, pyodbc 2.1.11
Original comment by asha...@chumpland.org
on 5 Oct 2011 at 3:28
Thank you, davidp.r...@gmail.com (comment #7)!
Your suggestion with len in sqlwchar.cpp at line 154 helped me (see attached
patch).
OpenSUSE 11.1, Python 2.6.2, pyodbc 2.1.11, freetds 0.91.
Original comment by alex.s.y...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2011 at 12:04
Attachments:
I am very grateful for you guys finding this. Fixed in 2.1.13-beta01 and
py3-3.0.1-beta06.
Original comment by mkleehammer
on 27 Oct 2011 at 6:44
Thank you for that patch. I hope to see it soon in stable version.
Original comment by mike.dob...@gmail.com
on 5 Nov 2011 at 11:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rsyr...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2011 at 6:43Attachments: