search

tomnomnom / httprobe

Take a list of domains and probe for working HTTP and HTTPS servers
MIT License
2.77k stars 497 forks source link

Specifying lots of ports is cumbersome #3

Open tomnomnom opened 5 years ago

tomnomnom commented 5 years ago

We've already got the 'port templates' added in #1 which are cool

It'd be good to be able to support the following cases too:

Same protocol, multiple ports:

httprobe -p http:80,81,8000 -p https:8443,9001

No protocol; checks both HTTP and HTTPS:

httprobe -p 9001
httprobe -p 80,81,8443
Sy3Omda commented 5 years ago

what if I need to filter list of subdomains gathering via multiple tools for running web server regardless what port it use

tomnomnom commented 5 years ago

In that case you would need to specify every single port.

I'd suggest using a dedicated port scanner such as nmap in that situation as it'd be much faster :)

Sy3Omda commented 5 years ago

In that case you would need to specify every single port.

I'd suggest using a dedicated port scanner such as nmap in that situation as it'd be much faster :)

do you mean filter list of subdomains using Nmap! I thought Nmap scan only IPs! right?

tarunkant commented 4 years ago

Hello @tomnomnom, Is it possible to add scan for a range of ports, like now we need to specify specific ports we want to scan but it would be good if we could add a range of ports to scan like -p 0-200.

Or it would be even better if we could add a flag like -p full, it will scan full/all ports.

What do you think of it?

0xklaue commented 3 years ago

Hello @tomnomnom, Is it possible to add scan for a range of ports, like now we need to specify specific ports we want to scan but it would be good if we could add a range of ports to scan like -p 0-200.

Or it would be even better if we could add a flag like -p full, it will scan full/all ports.

What do you think of it?

Why not run nmap for the same mate? 🙂

gbiagomba commented 3 years ago

@tomnomnom just gonna leave this here for you my good sir https://github.com/tomnomnom/httprobe/issues/21#issuecomment-706174955 (hint, it has to do with how i use your tool with nmap ;)