Closed shiluotang closed 5 years ago
See the header comments of the API. The pos[2] does not show ECEF-Z but ellipsoidal height.
I think it is a minus RE_WG84, if not larger than it, then will set the elevation to 90. Pretty fair
You did not fully understand the principle of the design logic. Based on my understanding, in this case, there is no approximate coordinates of the station, then all the satellite elevations are PI/2.0, then it is equally weight for all satellites, this is only used in the initial case. Yudan
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:10 AM shiluotang notifications@github.com wrote:
[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3193750/63679509-0896f700-c824-11e9-9033-8c6559e9ad39.png
As the image describes, if ECEF-z is no larger than RE_WGS84, then the yield elevation will be 90 degrees. This is definitely not right!
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tomojitakasu/RTKLIB/issues/483?email_source=notifications&email_token=AD6QBIZPPC3RLN7OSZ64LMLQGOMZVA5CNFSM4IPNR7RKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HHKRCQA, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD6QBI7D7XNBFEHYDZK6UZLQGOMZVANCNFSM4IPNR7RA .
See the header comments of the API. The pos[2] does not show ECEF-Z but ellipsoidal height.
Thanks for you suggestion! It's my fault! I was misled by the method name ecef2enu which made me took pos parameter as ECEF coordinate is actually BLH thing.
By the way, the name "ecef2enu" is really easy to confuse rookies.
As the image describes, if ECEF-z is no larger than RE_WGS84, then the yield elevation will be 90 degrees. This is definitely not right!