Closed raiym closed 2 years ago
Yes, this is indeed so. We thought it was better this way, so that other words beginning with //
could be defined. If you are unhappy with this choice, you can always redefine //
:
' // ::_ //
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 23:59 ton-blockchain notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes, this is indeed so. We thought it was better this way, so that other words beginning with // could be defined. If you are unhappy with this choice, you can always redefine //:
' // ::_ //
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ton-blockchain/ton/issues/150?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABLPIGPIK5R4PDBIFHXKKJTQOYOJRA5CNFSM4JBBS2KKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEBKA35A#issuecomment-542379508, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLPIGPVKPAIXCXMB75SH63QOYOJRANCNFSM4JBBS2KA .
This will give interpreter error:
But this will run fine: