Open strohel opened 3 years ago
Mentioned by @skywhale in https://github.com/tonarino/actor/pull/53#discussion_r635802296 CC @bschwind.
It would be certainly more locally consistent as the receive_timeout field is already private on purpose. It would cause some churn for crate users, but better sooner than later?
receive_timeout
Note that Context is no longer user-constructible after merging #53.
Context
Mentioned by @skywhale in https://github.com/tonarino/actor/pull/53#discussion_r635802296 CC @bschwind.
It would be certainly more locally consistent as the
receive_timeout
field is already private on purpose. It would cause some churn for crate users, but better sooner than later?Note that
Context
is no longer user-constructible after merging #53.