Closed fontanaricardo closed 6 years ago
@fontanaricardo sorry for taking so long to get to this. I see my last merge caused some conflicts, kindly fix. Also, I'd already merged in an implementation for multiple equals, can you just keep the optional sharp implementation?
replaced by #7
@fontanaricardo sorry for taking so long to get to this. I see my last merge caused some conflicts, kindly fix. Also, I'd already merged in an implementation for multiple equals, can you just keep the optional sharp implementation?