When DEFL can't find definition, it doesn't return end-marker and no any info regarding response details, just error in server log
00:49:06.550 [error] Task #PID<0.149.0> started from #PID<0.147.0> terminating ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: ["Orders"] /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/api/defl.exs:84: Alchemist.API.Defl.normalize/1 /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/api/defl.exs:13: Alchemist.API.Defl.request/1 /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/helpers/process_commands.exs:21: Alchemist.Helpers.ProcessCommands.process/2 /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/server/socket.exs:47: Alchemist.Server.Socket.serve/2 (elixir) lib/task/supervised.ex:85: Task.Supervised.do_apply/2 (stdlib) proc_lib.erl:247: :proc_lib.init_p_do_apply/3 Function: #Function<0.65933552/0 in Alchemist.Server.Socket.loop_acceptor/2> Args: []
There is also different error in log in case DEFL has incorrect syntax. Is it intended behavior? Any plans to add error responses for such cases?
When DEFL can't find definition, it doesn't return end-marker and no any info regarding response details, just error in server log
00:49:06.550 [error] Task #PID<0.149.0> started from #PID<0.147.0> terminating ** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: ["Orders"] /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/api/defl.exs:84: Alchemist.API.Defl.normalize/1 /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/api/defl.exs:13: Alchemist.API.Defl.request/1 /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/helpers/process_commands.exs:21: Alchemist.Helpers.ProcessCommands.process/2 /Users/p_hrechyshkin/workspace/self/alchemist-server/lib/server/socket.exs:47: Alchemist.Server.Socket.serve/2 (elixir) lib/task/supervised.ex:85: Task.Supervised.do_apply/2 (stdlib) proc_lib.erl:247: :proc_lib.init_p_do_apply/3 Function: #Function<0.65933552/0 in Alchemist.Server.Socket.loop_acceptor/2> Args: []There is also different error in log in case DEFL has incorrect syntax. Is it intended behavior? Any plans to add error responses for such cases?