I have a small change here for alchemist-goto-definition-at-point. If no scope can be found, i.e. if (alchemist-scope-expression) returns "", the user is prompted in the minibuffer.
The rationale for this is that sometimes I would like to jump to a definition that is not written somewhere in the current buffer. So instead of writing this into the buffer in order to be able to jump there, I would prefer to write it into the minibuffer.
Could you help to make this pull request even nicer?
please comment on how I changed alchemist-goto--open-definition. Should I do something differently?
Is there a way to ask for the definition in the minibuffer with completion support? I think this would be even better.
Hi,
I have a small change here for
alchemist-goto-definition-at-point. If no scope can be found, i.e. if(alchemist-scope-expression)returns"", the user is prompted in the minibuffer.The rationale for this is that sometimes I would like to jump to a definition that is not written somewhere in the current buffer. So instead of writing this into the buffer in order to be able to jump there, I would prefer to write it into the minibuffer.
Could you help to make this pull request even nicer?
alchemist-goto--open-definition. Should I do something differently?