search

tonyc / open890

A web-based remote UI for the Kenwood TS-890.
Other
75 stars 3 forks source link

Update "Building from Source" wiki page to build a local release using "mix release" #80

Open Tyrbiter opened 3 years ago

Tyrbiter commented 3 years ago

Using VFO A/B switch causes the radio to reply with an unexpected FT1 response when changing to VFO B and FT0 when changing to VFO A.

This may be cosmetic, but since the VFO change is using an "FRx;" command, and gets an "FRx" response I assume there is a reason for the "FTx"

Looking at the command reference this appears to be tied in to Split mode

66

tonyc commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the report - this is probably indeed tied to SPLIT mode, which I haven't implemented yet. I have debug messages set up for anything I am not explicitly listening for to make it easier to see what is going on - so the messages labeled [debug] can probably be safely ignored. :)

Tyrbiter commented 3 years ago

I should have read through all the issues first shouldn't I?

Yes, it's a minor thing, but having the output to the terminal meant I saw it and thought it slightly odd. That's why I came back and linked it to #66

tonyc commented 3 years ago

Ah yep. Plus you are more likely to see the debug output using a source build, compared to a released binary.

tonyc commented 3 years ago

Whoops - I closed this prematurely.

Thinking about this, the "Building from Source" wiki page is more of a development process, and thus, you see the debug messages. I will keep this issue open as a reminder to update the wiki page with a slightly different process, which will exclude the debug messages in the terminal output.

Tyrbiter commented 3 years ago

Yes, that sounds sensible, I dived in head-first with this project with a git build and a develop checkout, one thing I was intending to do is to create a spec file so that I can build an rpm package for Fedora using a release tarball as the basis, but haven't got that far yet.

tonyc commented 3 years ago

That would be interesting. If there is a sensible way to build the RPM using the CI process here on github, I could roll it into that process as well. The Linux builds run on Ubuntu 20.04, and I'm not sure if there are any requirements for building the RPM (if it needs to be built on a Fedora system, etc), or if an RPM can be reasonably built on an Ubuntu system and then distributed for Fedora users.