Closed AlistairNWard closed 8 years ago
My rationale is that a high impact variant trumps a moderate variant with clinvar annotations. But you make a valid point. There are so few clinvar variants that they should stand out. Perhaps gene.iobio should only rank only on 'pathogenic' variants and 'likely pathogenic' but not on 'uncertain significance'.
I thought we were only ranking on pathogenic and likely_pathogenic. If not, yes we should.
The ordering of rows for ranking has changed. We should keep ClinVar on top by default, not SnpEff.