Closed tonydisera closed 8 years ago
Good question. I think it is valuable to see that there is evidence for a pathogenic variant, even though it is filtered out. We should maybe discuss this on Skype and get Chase in as well? My initial thoughts are:
Hmm... I favor option #2 because it is simpler, but hesitate to have the variants in the ranked variants card not match the variants shown in the variants/sample card.
This is a similar issue to the alternate transcript. We want to alert the user that there is a high-impact variant, but it is not in the current visible set of variants. Perhaps we should address both issues with one design.
I was a bit perplexed to see a ClinVar glyph in the gene button, but no corresponding variant in the Ranked Variants card (or variants card).
But when I unclick the "PASS" filter for VCF filter status, the variant appears:
Since the VCF filter status is excluding non-pass records, the code that looks at the variants to determine the highest impact ClinVar (and other categories, like SIFT, PolyPhen, etc), should exclude these same records by default.
Al, what do you think? I guess the downside is that we run the risk of not bringing attention to a variant that is highly pathogenic, yet doesn't pass VCF quality checks.