Open topaz-next-bot opened 3 years ago
Comment by topaz-bot Wednesday Jan 08, 2020 at 14:11:33
Comment by Kthulupwns Friday Jul 31, 2015 at 04:11 GMT
This skims on a bigger issue which is just the way pet damage (not specifically summoner) is calculated.
Comment by topaz-bot Wednesday Jan 08, 2020 at 14:11:34
Comment by Hozu Tuesday Oct 06, 2015 at 16:23 GMT
Looking at the script it has literally phys damage times magic resist. But that's not what's causing it - what is is that value is then put into addMobBonuses, part of which checks against the MDT- mod, which would be maxed out with magic shield. So uh... yeah this doesn't work like retail at all.
Comment by topaz-bot Wednesday Jan 08, 2020 at 14:11:36
Comment by teschnei Tuesday Oct 06, 2015 at 16:31 GMT
The BG wiki links imply that the entire damage is modified by MAB, and is blocked entirely by physical immunity. You're saying that despite being modified by MAB/mdb, it is not affected by magic immunity?
Comment by topaz-bot Wednesday Jan 08, 2020 at 14:11:38
Comment by teschnei Tuesday Oct 06, 2015 at 17:35 GMT
Well, 2 physical hits 1 magical hit isn't very informative when people on the forums claim that physical immunity stops it and MAB does affect the whole move. Remind me to ask Byrth tonight and I'll get an answer
Issue by topaz-bot Wednesday Jan 08, 2020 at 14:11:32 Originally opened as: project-topaz/topaz - Issue 36
Issue by Zenny89 Friday Jul 31, 2015 at 01:42 GMT Originally opened as DarkstarProject/darkstar - Issue 1827
When fighting Tinnin, whenever the mob used either Pyric Bulwark (immune to physical damage) or Polar Bulwark (immune to magical damage), Flaming Crush was completely blocked despite being part physical and part magical damage.