Thanks for giving us feedback on the book. Please follow these guidelines:
Comments or questions on the content
Please tell us where exactly the issue is (e.g. chapter, section, figure number, etc.) and, whenever possible, copy/paste the text in question using > in the issue. Also, please state the version of the book by referencing the date on the book's first page (under the title and authors).
In the version dated "2018-05-12", capitalization in article/book names are inconsistent. Also, sometimes initials are used for names, sometimes not:
> Agresti, Alan. 2012. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience.
> Altman, D. 1991. “Categorising Continuous Variables.” British Journal of Cancer, no. 5:975.
Thanks for the great book.
I believe that table 2.3 is produced using a small training dataset which contains 89 patients. Have you used 10-fold cross-validation to compute the P-values for the risk predictors?
When 5-fold cross validation is used, a different result is yielded (for HypercholesterolemiaHistory).
Could you please advise me on this (What is the optimal value of K when the dataset is small)?
Thanks for giving us feedback on the book. Please follow these guidelines:
Comments or questions on the content
Please tell us where exactly the issue is (e.g. chapter, section, figure number, etc.) and, whenever possible, copy/paste the text in question using
>in the issue. Also, please state the version of the book by referencing the date on the book's first page (under the title and authors).See this issue as an example:
Thanks for the great book.
I believe that table 2.3 is produced using a small training dataset which contains 89 patients. Have you used 10-fold cross-validation to compute the P-values for the risk predictors?
When 5-fold cross validation is used, a different result is yielded (for HypercholesterolemiaHistory). Could you please advise me on this (What is the optimal value of K when the dataset is small)?