Closed Nashtare closed 2 years ago
Why don't we call this PR "Interactive proof generation"? it describes better what adding
Why don't we call this PR "Interactive proof generation"? it describes better what adding
Sorry! It should be called "interactive trace generation"! the proof generation have always been interactive
This PR introduces a first version of RAPs. The logic of the copy columns / permutation argument is left to the user for now. This will be abstracted away in a follow-up PR. There should be no performance impact on existing programs that don't require RAPs.