Closed pirj closed 5 years ago
The benchmarks were not properly normalized, and for some reason 'each hundredth' was significantly faster than 'only existing' for *belongs_to.
*belongs_to
The order of 'with gem'/'without gem' was not consistent across benchmarks.
The order optimistic-realistic-pessimistic was not consistent across benchmarks.
Thank you 👍 I'll update charts soon
The benchmarks were not properly normalized, and for some reason 'each hundredth' was significantly faster than 'only existing' for
*belongs_to
.The order of 'with gem'/'without gem' was not consistent across benchmarks.
The order optimistic-realistic-pessimistic was not consistent across benchmarks.