Closed eileenmcnaughton closed 2 years ago
For the upgrade.php.php
template, I could be misinterpreting - but it looks there's a bikesheddy thing around how to format a commented-out function, eg
/**
* (1) Line-comments for entire function.
*/
// function helloWorld() {
// echo "Hello world\n";
// }
/**
* (2) Block comment for entire function
*
function helloWorld() {
echo "Hello world\n";
} // */
/**
* (3) Line-comments for function body
*/
function helloWorld() {
// echo "Hello world\n";
}
Most of the examples in this file are (1)'s. There were a couple (2)'s, which the PR changes to (3)'s.
There are small/edgy trade-offs... but overall, it seems preferable (easier to read) if the file is internally-consistent. I pushed switch the outliers to (1). Or is there a reason they need to be different?
Nah - they dont' need to be different - what you did is fine
Actually the need to NOT be 2 - for CI - but between 1 & 3 - both should be ok
OK, cool.
Ran phpunit
and tests/make-example.sh
. The latter showed that it needed some new use
statements. Pushed up.
Merging.
I recently submitted a civix-generated extension & found man boilerplate lines didn't pass style - this fixes.
It also removes a 'not-a-word' 'myinstall' & switches to 'my_install' - we shouldn't make people have to add made-up words to their IDE spelling checkers...
https://github.com/civicrm/civicrm-core/pull/24585