Closed kpgalligan closed 5 years ago
See big_type_check. This is what's throwing off issues.
The single type check call wasn't failing on the typeinfo check call. The system tries to get info for both named fields and the address of those fields ("something" and "&something"). I'm not sure why, but that was throwing us off. Reverted to skip the address of calls.
Not sure exactly why, but sometimes the pointer isn't valid. I'm not sure if this is for any data, just arrays, or whatever. The old "check" method would simply skip over invalid pointers. That may be fine, but I'd like to understand what's actually happening.