Closed towerofnix closed 8 years ago
Maybe have the shortened .tul and the longer .tulun?
@109C But what does that have to do with tlnccuwagnf? :package:
Maybe have the shortened .tul and the longer .tulun?
Eh, I'm not sure I want multiple extensions :P
We should stick with .tul
, as now use(...)
uses it internally.
Also .tul
is a good extension.
We should stick with .tul, as now use(...) uses it internally.
kek. It uses it internally in your fork.
(But I'm going to merge that anyways)
But yes tul
ftw :P
I'm going to go with
program.tul
for now, any other suggestions?