search

tpapp / lla

Lisp Linear Algebra
Boost Software License 1.0
90 stars 17 forks source link

Test failure #6

Closed epipping closed 13 years ago

epipping commented 13 years ago

Hello,

I've installed lla using quicklisp (that's lla-20110730-git.tgz).

I've installed the test suite as well and run it. I'm being told there's been an error but LLA is not being very precise.

CL-USER> (lla-tests:RUN-LLA-TESTS) Start: LLA-TESTS Start: LINEAR-ALGEBRA-TESTS Start: PINNED-ARRAY-TESTS Start: BASIC-TESTS Start: UTILITIES-TESTS

<Results for LLA-TESTS 22 Tests, 1 Error>

CL-USER>

I'm on sbcl 1.0.51, netlib lapack 3.3.0, OpenBLAS 1.0alpha2.2, and the current quicklisp version of anything common lisp.

epipping commented 13 years ago

Github eats the test results. Stripping the angle brackets now:

Results for LLA-TESTS 22 Tests, 1 Error

epipping commented 13 years ago

Nevermind, I just saw there's an update on quicklisp. The version from 20110829 passes all its tests.

CL-USER> (lla-tests:RUN-LLA-TESTS) Start: LLA-TESTS Start: LINEAR-ALGEBRA-TESTS Start: PINNED-ARRAY-TESTS Start: BASIC-TESTS Start: UTILITIES-TESTS

Results for LLA-TESTS [25 Successful tests]

CL-USER>

(this time I really do mean to hit "comment & close").

tpapp commented 13 years ago

Hi,

This is not a case of LLA not being precise, it is just that the testing framework (lift) gives detailed information only on demand. Try

(describe *)

after the test and send me the output.

Best,

Tamas

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, pipping wrote:

Hello,

I've installed lla using quicklisp (that's lla-20110730-git.tgz).

I've installed the test suite as well and run it. I'm being told there's been an error but LLA is not being very precise.

CL-USER> (lla-tests:RUN-LLA-TESTS) Start: LLA-TESTS Start: LINEAR-ALGEBRA-TESTS Start: PINNED-ARRAY-TESTS Start: BASIC-TESTS Start: UTILITIES-TESTS

<Results for LLA-TESTS 22 Tests, 1 Error>

CL-USER>

I'm on sbcl 1.0.51, netlib lapack 3.3.0, OpenBLAS 1.0alpha2.2, and the current quicklisp version of anything common lisp.

epipping commented 13 years ago

Hi,

as I said, that problem has been resolved by updating LLA.

Do you want me to downgrade again and send you the output?

tpapp commented 13 years ago

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011, pipping wrote:

Hi,

as I said, that problem has been resolved by updating LLA.

Do you want me to downgrade again and send you the output?

No, thanks.

Both cl-num-utils and lla are work in progress, so if you encounter bugs, it is probably best to update both and see if they are resolved.

Best,

Tamas