Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌ Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.83%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	7.71 ⭐	8.17 ⭐	0.46 👎
Method Length	72.21 🙂	72.28 🙂	0.07 👎
Working memory	4.60 ⭐	4.65 ⭐	0.05 👎
Quality	66.11% 🙂	65.28% 🙂	-0.83% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	1425	1411	-14

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
processscheduler/cost.py	83.02% ⭐	83.09% ⭐	0.07% 👍
processscheduler/problem.py	65.73% 🙂	62.93% 🙂	-2.80% 👎
processscheduler/solution.py	32.52% 😞	33.19% 😞	0.67% 👍
test/test_cost.py	77.59% ⭐	78.65% ⭐	1.06% 👍
test/test_features.py	86.90% ⭐	86.90% ⭐	0.00%
test/test_solver.py	74.37% 🙂	72.92% 🙂	-1.45% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
processscheduler/solution.py	SchedulingSolution.render_gantt_matplotlib	50 ⛔	808 ⛔		4.78% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods
processscheduler/solution.py	SchedulingSolution.render_gantt_plotly	23 😞	357 ⛔		23.12% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods
processscheduler/problem.py	SchedulingProblem.add_indicator_resource_cost	21 😞	205 ⛔		34.55% 😞	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods
processscheduler/problem.py	SchedulingProblem.add_objective_flowtime_single_resource	4 ⭐	252 ⛔	12 😞	47.57% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
test/test_solver.py	TestSolver.test_alternative_workers_2	0 ⭐	193 😞	15 😞	51.07% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!