Open tpilz opened 9 years ago
Same for river routing information (response.dat), which could also be accommodated in the db.
But river routing information are contained within table 'subbasins' (columns 'lag_time' and 'retention')?!
This is the original (i.e. old) WASA routing scheme. For the Muskingum-option and sediment transport, more data is needed (friction values, erodibilities, etc.). Therefore, probable a related table (instead of more columns) would be my favourite choice.
Should be treated as three issues:
strategic reservoirs:
db_create() / db_update()
db_fill() based on output of function wasa_reservoir_par()
db_check()
small reservoirs:
db_create() / db_update()
db_fill() based on output of function ...()
db_check()
river (UHG-routing):
db_create() / db_update()
db_fill() based on output of function ...()
db_check()
river (Muskingum-routing):
db_create() / db_update()
db_fill() based on output of function ...()
db_check()
Include reservoir table into parameter database.
Possibly affects: