As I explained in #66, I had to create many repeated prefixes in order to allow different case scenarios. I thought using the same name would group all the markers, but instead it shows different markers in the UI
I know by doing 66 I'll have the chance to have them grouped again, since I'll be able to use a single declaration for all the case scenarios, but may be worth considering to group them by name anyway. Having repeated marker names in the UI is weird and a bad UX.
As I explained in #66, I had to create many repeated prefixes in order to allow different case scenarios. I thought using the same name would group all the markers, but instead it shows different markers in the UI
I know by doing 66 I'll have the chance to have them grouped again, since I'll be able to use a single declaration for all the case scenarios, but may be worth considering to group them by name anyway. Having repeated marker names in the UI is weird and a bad UX.