The one part of this standard that almost certainly will need maintenance as we move forward is the lists of terminology, especially those that are more content than "structural".
As an example, I just stumbled upon the fact we don't have AVI in species to allow avian CVIs. While we do almost all of these on NPIP forms instead of traditional CVIs, some do move that way.
I would ask everyone "testing" the standard to be especially careful to look for these terminology issues so they can be discussed and appropriate (but not excessive) amendments made.
The one part of this standard that almost certainly will need maintenance as we move forward is the lists of terminology, especially those that are more content than "structural".
As an example, I just stumbled upon the fact we don't have AVI in species to allow avian CVIs. While we do almost all of these on NPIP forms instead of traditional CVIs, some do move that way.
I would ask everyone "testing" the standard to be especially careful to look for these terminology issues so they can be discussed and appropriate (but not excessive) amendments made.