At the moment paths/relations are getting labeld by their sac-scale (T1, T2, ...).
When using maps people in general want to know the name of a trail, cause thats whats also written on the signs/marks.
In OSM a relation can have a 'name'/'ref' tag to be identfied, whereby a relation with the 'ref=6' can have various members way(highway=path) that are part of it e.g. 'ref=6B' and even 'ref=3'. See also the attached image, where the relation consists of the ways 3, 6, 6B.
So i suggest to use the 'ref'/'name' tag of ways where available to label paths. If such information is not available for a path use the name/ref of the relation.
Hi! Currently it renders both path name and sac scale. Adding the path ref and relation refs is possible. Will explore some rendering possibilities soon.
At the moment paths/relations are getting labeld by their sac-scale (T1, T2, ...). When using maps people in general want to know the name of a trail, cause thats whats also written on the signs/marks.
In OSM a relation can have a 'name'/'ref' tag to be identfied, whereby a relation with the 'ref=6' can have various members way(highway=path) that are part of it e.g. 'ref=6B' and even 'ref=3'. See also the attached image, where the relation consists of the ways 3, 6, 6B.
So i suggest to use the 'ref'/'name' tag of ways where available to label paths. If such information is not available for a path use the name/ref of the relation.