I see that someone else has had problems with Cells 4.x not following the standard conventions for naming templates. #460 But the solution is opaque .
We have a large project with a lot of .html.erb templates and _.html.erb partials which worked with cells 3.x and don't work with cells 4.x . I don't want to go through renaming them because it's an unnecessary pain.
Is there some reason why this change was made, and not documented in the upgrade guide?
If I forked the project, made a PR to correct this issue would it be accepted or is there some deep reason why the standard naming convention isn't being followed?
I see that someone else has had problems with Cells 4.x not following the standard conventions for naming templates. #460 But the solution is opaque .
We have a large project with a lot of .html.erb templates and _.html.erb partials which worked with cells 3.x and don't work with cells 4.x . I don't want to go through renaming them because it's an unnecessary pain.
Is there some reason why this change was made, and not documented in the upgrade guide?
If I forked the project, made a PR to correct this issue would it be accepted or is there some deep reason why the standard naming convention isn't being followed?