codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
916f20c) 80.24% compared to head (600bfcf) 80.24%.:exclamation: Current head 600bfcf differs from pull request most recent head 6179a7a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6179a7a to get more accurate results
:exclamation: Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #748 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage 80.24% 80.24% ======================================== Files 7 7 Lines 1534 1534 ======================================== Hits 1231 1231 Misses 303 303 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
For many of the traits from the floras, especially the numeric traits, there is a column
categorythat captures the exact plant part to which the measurement refers (e.g. leaf vs leaflet). There were 100+ distinct values in this column, many of which are just slight syntax differences.This is a first pass at condensing these into more curated context values. It is difficult, because all values that distinguish between replicate measurements for a single taxon by trait combination should be maintained, but terms that aren't being used for this purpose should be collapsed.
There are also a few instances where there truly are multiple values for a single taxon by trait combination within a flora and these can then be assigned "replicate observation" numbers, allowing the datasets to pivot wider.
Currently, they all pivot, but this does not mean all information that could be mapped as a context has been. It is just a realistic ending point for now.