Closed rossmounce closed 8 years ago
Yes, right now it only does accepted names, but shouldn't be too hard to add this. Will have a look...
Added the unresolved names
> plant_lookup_version_current()
[1] "1.1.0"
> lookup_table("Carpoceras tatianae",by_species=TRUE)
number.of.accepted.species
Carpoceras tatianae 0
number.of.accepted.and.unresolved.species
5
genus family order group
Carpoceras Martyniaceae Lamiales Angiosperms
I think this broke some things though as apparently the same "unresolved" genera are listed in multiple families. Might take a little while to figure out how to fix that one.
for example Acanthodium is an accepted name in the Sematophyllaceae and an unresolved name in the Acanthaceae. hmmm
Perhaps this should be implemented as an optional parameter for the user to toggle on/off e.g. include_unresolved=TRUE
FWIW here's my use case: I've used taxonlookup
to check all >20,000 IUCN-assessed plant species (I ran them first through Taxonstand first, heck of a lot of misspelt/synonym/invalid/'too new' names!). I want to know what the 'coverage' is like % species per genera. Taxonlookup numbers seem very conservative.
For instance Taraxacum, TPL lists 2336 accepted names & 551 unresolved http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=taraxacum
Yet taxonlookup
version 1.0.1 returns a total species number of 2332 for this same genera. Presumably taxonlookup is deferring to APweb here? [Just want to clarify the origin of the numbers I'm getting!]
sounds like a cool project.
for the species in genera counts, we only use TPL. If you look here: http://www.theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/A/Compositae/Taraxacum/
There are 2332 "accepted species" and 2336 "accepted names". So there are 4 "accepted" subspecies or varieties or something. Taxonlookup drops the subspecific names (as the use of these is so variably across plant groups), so I think that's the discrepancy you're getting.
aaah... my bad. I was just ctrl-F'ing the page. That makes a lot more sense now
I think it's working now
> pl <- plant_lookup("1.1.1")
> plant_lookup_version_current()
[1] "1.1.1"
> lookup_table("Carpoceras tatianae",by_species=TRUE)
genus family order group
Carpoceras tatianae Carpoceras Martyniaceae Lamiales Angiosperms
As of now the unresolved genera that are listed in >1 family won't be returned. Hopefully plant list v1.2 fixes that bug. Let me know if that works for you.
Also if you want species in genus counts, this is the best way to get them:
> pl<-plant_lookup(include_counts = TRUE)
> head(pl)
number.of.accepted.species number.of.accepted.and.unresolved.species genus
1 2 5 Acorus
2 1 1 Albidella
3 8 16 Alisma
4 1 1 Astonia
5 3 5 Baldellia
6 1 1 Burnatia
family order group
1 Acoraceae Acorales Angiosperms
2 Alismataceae Alismatales Angiosperms
3 Alismataceae Alismatales Angiosperms
4 Alismataceae Alismatales Angiosperms
5 Alismataceae Alismatales Angiosperms
6 Alismataceae Alismatales Angiosperms
I just noticed many TPL unresolved names don't seem to get looked up.
e.g. Carpoceras tatianae (Bordz.) Grossh. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-2701287
Is there anyway to force it to return the higher-level groups? I have a lot of unresolved names. I would expect this to be returned: "Martyniaceae" "Lamiales" "Angiosperms"
I could give you another 200 names like that if you want, but the basic commonality seems to be that they are all TPL "Unresolved"