Dear Trajche Kralev,
as I was both forking your project for some modifications as well as using it as a base for creating an InvoicePlane plugin working mostly the same as your package I wanted to ask if it would be fine when I publish my InvoicePlane project under MIT instead of LGPLv3. Though the most important part of the package is the php-saml integration which is also under MIT, I realized that as I used your package as an example it would not be appropriate to just publishing under another license.
Please let me know if this would be fine. I've just published everything and realized afterward that it should have been published under LGPLv3 as I used minimal parts of your code. In case it would not be fine I would either change the license or remove your code parts.
Dear Trajche Kralev, as I was both forking your project for some modifications as well as using it as a base for creating an InvoicePlane plugin working mostly the same as your package I wanted to ask if it would be fine when I publish my InvoicePlane project under MIT instead of LGPLv3. Though the most important part of the package is the php-saml integration which is also under MIT, I realized that as I used your package as an example it would not be appropriate to just publishing under another license.
The package I am speaking about can be found here: https://github.com/kingstarter/invoiceplane-saml
Please let me know if this would be fine. I've just published everything and realized afterward that it should have been published under LGPLv3 as I used minimal parts of your code. In case it would not be fine I would either change the license or remove your code parts.
Greetings, Steve