search

transient-haskell / transient

A full stack, reactive architecture for general purpose programming. Algebraic and monadically composable primitives for concurrency, parallelism, event handling, transactions, multithreading, Web, and distributed computing with complete de-inversion of control (No callbacks, no blocking, pure state)
MIT License
633 stars 28 forks source link

`transient` fails to build #3

Closed hvr closed 8 years ago

hvr commented 9 years ago

See http://matrix.hackage.haskell.org/package/transient and I can't figure out which bounds need to be added to transient.cabal other than probably base >= 4.6.

Here's the compile error I'm seeing with GHC 7.6 through 7.10:

[1 of 1] Compiling Main             ( move.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-a1f04431/build/move/move-tmp/Main.o )

move.hs:77:34:
    Couldn't match expected type ‘(t, t1)’ with actual type ‘Node’
    Relevant bindings include
      remoteHost :: t (bound at move.hs:77:9)
      remotePort :: t1 (bound at move.hs:77:20)
    In the expression: head $ tail nodes
    In a pattern binding: (remoteHost, remotePort) = head $ tail nodes
    In the expression:
      do { nodes <- logged getNodes;
           logged $ liftIO $ print $ "NODES=" ++ show nodes;
           let (remoteHost, remotePort) = head $ tail nodes;
           examples' remoteHost remotePort }
xcabal: Error: some packages failed to install:
transient-0.1.0.1 failed during the building phase. The exception was:
ExitFailure 1
agocorona commented 9 years ago

Hi, Thanks. I uploaded a new version to Hackage.

2015-08-22 8:33 GMT+02:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel notifications@github.com:

See http://matrix.hackage.haskell.org/package/transient and I can't figure out which bounds need to be added to transient.cabal other than probably base >= 4.6.

Here's the compile error I'm seeing with GHC 7.6 through 7.10:

[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( move.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-a1f04431/build/move/move-tmp/Main.o )

move.hs:77:34: Couldn't match expected type ‘(t, t1)’ with actual type ‘Node’ Relevant bindings include remoteHost :: t (bound at move.hs:77:9) remotePort :: t1 (bound at move.hs:77:20) In the expression: head $ tail nodes In a pattern binding: (remoteHost, remotePort) = head $ tail nodes In the expression: do { nodes <- logged getNodes; logged $ liftIO $ print $ "NODES=" ++ show nodes; let (remoteHost, remotePort) = head $ tail nodes; examples' remoteHost remotePort } xcabal: Error: some packages failed to install: transient-0.1.0.1 failed during the building phase. The exception was: ExitFailure 1

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/agocorona/transient/issues/3.

Alberto.

hvr commented 9 years ago

seems better... but it's still broken for GHC 7.0, GHC 7.2 and GHC 7.4:

snap


[1 of 6] Compiling Transient.Base   ( src/Transient/Base.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-9419efc8/build/Transient/Base.o )

src/Transient/Base.hs:70:20:
    Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef'
    Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:285:16:
    Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef'
    Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:286:18:
    Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef'
    Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:478:24: Not in scope: `forkFinally'
xcabal: Error: some packages failed to install:
transient-0.1.0.2 failed during the building phase. The exception was:
ExitFailure 1

Also, was the transient-0.1.0.1 release completely broken? or is there any chance to get it to compile by using specific versions of the build-dependencies?

agocorona commented 9 years ago

Herbert, the failure with the 0.1.0.0 is is because move.hs does not compile,, but it is only a test program. it is a matter of removing it from the cabal file

2015-08-22 12:13 GMT+02:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel notifications@github.com :

seems better... but it's still broken for GHC 7.0, GHC 7.2 and GHC 7.4:

[image: snap] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/285533/9423518/11601b90-48c7-11e5-8692-394fb048c32f.png

[1 of 6] Compiling Transient.Base ( src/Transient/Base.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-9419efc8/build/Transient/Base.o )

src/Transient/Base.hs:70:20: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:285:16: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:286:18: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:478:24: Not in scope: `forkFinally' xcabal: Error: some packages failed to install: transient-0.1.0.2 failed during the building phase. The exception was: ExitFailure 1

Also, was the transient-0.1.0.1 release completely broken? or is there any chance to get it to compile by using specific versions of the build-dependencies?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/agocorona/transient/issues/3#issuecomment-133675003.

Alberto.

agocorona commented 9 years ago

But in the meantime I discovered a bug introduced in the version 1 and fixed it in the version 2

2015-08-22 16:48 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocorona@gmail.com:

Herbert, the failure with the 0.1.0.0 is is because move.hs does not compile,, but it is only a test program. it is a matter of removing it from the cabal file

2015-08-22 12:13 GMT+02:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel < notifications@github.com>:

seems better... but it's still broken for GHC 7.0, GHC 7.2 and GHC 7.4:

[image: snap] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/285533/9423518/11601b90-48c7-11e5-8692-394fb048c32f.png

[1 of 6] Compiling Transient.Base ( src/Transient/Base.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-9419efc8/build/Transient/Base.o )

src/Transient/Base.hs:70:20: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:285:16: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:286:18: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:478:24: Not in scope: `forkFinally' xcabal: Error: some packages failed to install: transient-0.1.0.2 failed during the building phase. The exception was: ExitFailure 1

Also, was the transient-0.1.0.1 release completely broken? or is there any chance to get it to compile by using specific versions of the build-dependencies?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/agocorona/transient/issues/3#issuecomment-133675003.

Alberto.

Alberto.

agocorona commented 9 years ago

Hope that this new version 0.3 will compile with 7.0 on

2015-08-22 16:52 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocorona@gmail.com:

But in the meantime I discovered a bug introduced in the version 1 and fixed it in the version 2

2015-08-22 16:48 GMT+02:00 Alberto G. Corona agocorona@gmail.com:

Herbert, the failure with the 0.1.0.0 is is because move.hs does not compile,, but it is only a test program. it is a matter of removing it from the cabal file

2015-08-22 12:13 GMT+02:00 Herbert Valerio Riedel < notifications@github.com>:

seems better... but it's still broken for GHC 7.0, GHC 7.2 and GHC 7.4:

[image: snap] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/285533/9423518/11601b90-48c7-11e5-8692-394fb048c32f.png

[1 of 6] Compiling Transient.Base ( src/Transient/Base.hs, dist/dist-sandbox-9419efc8/build/Transient/Base.o )

src/Transient/Base.hs:70:20: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:285:16: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:286:18: Not in scope: atomicModifyIORef' Perhaps you meant `atomicModifyIORef' (imported from Data.IORef)

src/Transient/Base.hs:478:24: Not in scope: `forkFinally' xcabal: Error: some packages failed to install: transient-0.1.0.2 failed during the building phase. The exception was: ExitFailure 1

Also, was the transient-0.1.0.1 release completely broken? or is there any chance to get it to compile by using specific versions of the build-dependencies?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/agocorona/transient/issues/3#issuecomment-133675003 .

Alberto.

Alberto.

Alberto.