Closed vslavik closed 11 years ago
The expressions for Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese were incorrectly the same, but there's a subtle difference: in pt, 0 is considered plural, while it is singular in pt_BR.
pt
pt_BR
Sources: gettext-tools/src/plural-table.c in GNU gettext 0.18.3.1 as well as Mozilla and Launchpad language descriptions: https://translations.launchpad.net/+languages/pt_BR https://translations.launchpad.net/+languages/pt (Unicode CLDR doesn't have a Brazilian variant entry)
gettext-tools/src/plural-table.c
Just to link it here - there's a similar issue opened in the issue-tracker of unicode.org: http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/2746
Merged in e5e820a979
The expressions for Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese were incorrectly the same, but there's a subtle difference: in
pt
, 0 is considered plural, while it is singular inpt_BR
.Sources:
gettext-tools/src/plural-table.c
in GNU gettext 0.18.3.1 as well as Mozilla and Launchpad language descriptions: https://translations.launchpad.net/+languages/pt_BR https://translations.launchpad.net/+languages/pt (Unicode CLDR doesn't have a Brazilian variant entry)