Closed dupuy closed 14 years ago
Thank you for reporting this. I think we should try to do this on trunk and the 2.0 branch in case we release another 2.0.x bugfix.
Originally posted by Chris Leonard:
I have done some further investigation and it looks like many of the suggestions on the lang-mn etoys project are from a user:versionmerge. This is not a registered Pootle user on our server, so I have a theory that these are suggestions that pre-existed the migration from Pootle 1.2 to Pootle 2.0 (Sugar Labs / OLPC server was migrated recently). It is possible that the migration process lost some information about who made the suggestions, and the suggestor name has been substituted with user:versionmerge during the migration process.
I'm not sure of this, but it is my current working theory. I can see that on other projects, suggestions made since the migration do properly show the suggesting users identity.
suggestions made by versionmerge are the result of merge conflicts on version control updates.
in 2.0 the way we format suggestions changed that's why usernames in old suggestions are not showing up.
how important is it to support the old style?
Originally posted by Chris Leonard:
IMHO, it is not critical to support the old style across a version migration. The important thing is that new suggestions will display username as expected, and this has been confirmed to be the case. The original reporter (Cris anderson861@gmail.com) is satisfied with this explanation as long as the suggesting user displays going forward.
It might make a good note for the release notes to mention that resolving suggestions prior to a migration will minimize the impact of this.
Cris anderson861@gmail.com writes:
I replied:
There doesn't seem to be any inherent reason for this information to be suppressed - it would be useful to anyone who is looking at suggestions to see who added them.