Open roberthechtletex opened 2 weeks ago
I updated the kernel myself, as described above.
Still, this question remains: “And/Or should the MetaDatumBlock rather span the whole \ccSetProperty{publisher} or even \ccSetProperty{imprint}?”
IIRC, the general idea was that MetaDatum
and MetaDatumBlock
are more-or-less exclusive, that is, one "Element" in the imprint is either a MetaDatum
with a MetaDatumLabel
and a MetaDatumValue
, or a MetaDatumBlock
. Both elements can however be inside a broader MetaDatumBlock
, which in the standard definition is already the case for imprint
as a whole, see ll.1180-1195 in coco-title.dtx
. Think of MetaDatumBlock
as an "recursively embeddable" container, while MetaDatum
is a container for a key-value pair. It is however true that the cited declaration of the copyright
Property should contain a P
tag for the actual text. (MetaDatumValue
and MetaDatumLabel
don't need an extra P
, as they are already mapped to P
.)
There is no real convention yet on what to do with "label-less" meta data… We could also tag them as MetaDatum
instead of MetaDatumBlock
and a simple P
inside… I'm open to suggestions.
Shouldn't
rather look like this:
?
And/Or should the
MetaDatumBlock
rather span the whole\ccSetProperty{publisher}
or even\ccSetProperty{imprint}
?