Open gimsieke opened 7 years ago
The DocBook documentation states that @label
identifies the desired footnote mark. In this sense, it would be an appropriate choice. The term footnote mark is commonly used for marks in the text (e.g. LaTeX \footnotemark
).
I think DocBook’s label attribute is meant to set both marks at once.
If you are afraid that the semantics of label
is too ambiguous, then I would suggest to use xreflabel
. Here is a brief example:
<footnote>
<para role="Funotentext" css:text-align="left">
<phrase role="hub:identifier" xreflabel="*">1</phrase>
<phrase role="hub:separator" xml:space="preserve"> </phrase>
Footnote text
</para>
</footnote>
In OOXML:
<w:footnoteReference w:customMarkFollows="1" w:id="…"/>
, followed byw:t
with the label that is rendered in the text. It is not clear whether DocBook’s label attribute is intended to convey the label rendered in the note or in the text. Since we only usephrase[@role='hub:identifier']
to mark up the note label, we could use@label
for the differing text label. Otherwise we can maybe use@xreflabel
.