Open SamuelMarks opened 4 years ago
Thanks for reporting it. May we see the docx input? You can send it to letexml at le-tex dot de if it contains confidential information.
I haven’t done a thorough analysis but I think that only a generated bibliography will be converted to a latex bibliography. In addition, we support Citavi.
If you send us your input we can see whether it is possible to infer heuristically or by style name convention that a given section is a bibliography.
What worries me a bit is that there’s just \textbf{REFERENCES}
instead of a proper section heading in your output.
The error is caused by some printable material ([1]
) between \begin{enumerate}
and the first \item
. \begin{enumerate}
doesn't use an optional argument in its plain definition. However, the enumerate
package redefines the enumerate
evironment in a way that it does. Please make sure the a \usepackage{enumerate}
is written into the latex preamble if you want to utilize the optional argument of \begin{enumerate}
.
As an aside, DOCX bibliographies are currently not supported by our docx2hub module. We support only Citavi bibliographies at this time.
The error is caused by some printable material (
[1]
) between\begin{enumerate}
and the first\item
.\begin{enumerate}
doesn't use an optional argument in its plain definition. However, theenumerate
package redefines theenumerate
evironment in a way that it does. Please make sure the a\usepackage{enumerate}
is written into the latex preamble if you want to utilize the optional argument of\begin{enumerate}
.
docx2tex use the enumerate package for lists by default. I have to see the original docx file to analyze the issue.
Snippet that was generated:
(obviously I'm replacing this whole reference list with proper bibtex, but still thought to tell you this bug)