Closed witokondoria closed 8 years ago
@witokondoria I cannot accept this pull request because it creates faulty behavior as discussed in #98. Instead, you should use scoverage instead of trying to parse invalid line numbers.
Well, its narrowing the scope of the plugin. Just dont announce compatibility with JaCoCo, but with JaCoCo on non-generated-bytecode environments.
The idea after this PR was to add some flexibility to this plugin (instead of breaking its usage)
As a mixure between scala, traits and jacoco can end in coverage info on lines greater than the source file, it would be nice to not include that coverage, lust log the error and keep on going.