Open NicksonYap opened 5 years ago
There are some works and limits to do if I provide support for semantic Instance (mask rcnn):
In summary, the major problem is multi-scale RCNN architecture and data access/processing/visualization. It's not easy, I have no plan to develop the scannet data process/visualization, but a simple rcnn will be added in future.
@traveller59
I've limited experience with this but I believe ScanNet data is similar of that to KITTI such that:
.sens
file using https://github.com/ScanNet/ScanNet/tree/master/SensReader/python (I'm not sure but the pixels should be mapped onto point cloud) ScanNet can be downloaded by sending an agreement PDF to an email (It took me a day for a reply)
https://github.com/ScanNet/ScanNet#scannet-data
You'll be given a .py file to select what to download (it's a file called download-scannet.py
:wink: )
By simple RCNN do u mean combining 2D Image data with the point clouds? If we're able to do that then I believe most of the work is already done :sweat_smile:
Hi Yan Yan, @traveller59
Awesome repo! (the Docker image really helps)
Currently SparseConvNet tops the Scan-Net 3D Semantic label benchmark http://kaldir.vc.in.tum.de/scannet_benchmark/ code: https://github.com/facebookresearch/SparseConvNet/tree/master/examples/ScanNet
Since SpConv is an improvement of SparseConvNet, could probably try to top it :P
SECOND is more suitable for the Scan-Net 3D Semantic instance benchmark The current winner (3D-SIS) uses multiple 2D RGB features + 3D to obtain semantic instance
Any intentions to extend SECOND to run ScanNet data? (contains ply rgb pointclouds and images)
Regards