Closed daniel-craig closed 6 years ago
Hi @daniel-craig - thanks a lot for opening this issue and bringing this to our attention.
I've been investigating about EBS and I see that the applications deployed via this provider require a source bundle that can be a bucket in "Amazon S3, a commit in AWS CodeCommit, or the output of an AWS CodeBuild build (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/latest/api/API_CreateApplicationVersion.html).
After having read this, do you think the following proposal will be helpful?:
bucket_name
: Bucket name to upload the code of your app to. Elastic Beanstalk will create an application version from the source bundle in this Amazon S3 bucket.
Elastic Beanstalk will create an application version from the source bundle in this Amazon S3 bucket.
This is just what I was looking for, and I think it could improved a little if it stated that the application version that Beanstalk creates is the version that gets deployed i.e.
Elastic Beanstalk will create and deploy an application version from the source bundle in this Amazon S3 bucket.
I created a PR for your convenience: https://github.com/travis-ci/docs-travis-ci-com/pull/2007
Closing as per https://github.com/travis-ci/docs-travis-ci-com/pull/2007. Thanks again!!
There is no explanation given for the rationale behind requiring the name of an s3 bucket when deploying to Beanstalk. This is confusing to new users. See https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/deployment/elasticbeanstalk/