Thanks for a useful library. I have test project that uses this library and is strong named signed, thus it complains that this library is not.
Strong name signing is pretty simple as this PR shows. However, if you want to approve this, do make sure you are aware of downside related to the .net framework described in the article from Microsoft.
Hi there
Thanks for a useful library. I have test project that uses this library and is strong named signed, thus it complains that this library is not.
Strong name signing is pretty simple as this PR shows. However, if you want to approve this, do make sure you are aware of downside related to the .net framework described in the article from Microsoft.
Thanks, Egil