Open dshintani404 opened 2 years ago
Now I consider the following DAG. (2, 3) and (4, 5) are executed in parallel, respectively.
As far as I thought, this DAG cannot be represented in a format of digdag. If it is modified as following, it can.
"+workflow": "+1": {} "+group": _parallel: 'true' "+3": {} "+group": "+2": {} "+group": _parallel: 'true' "+4": {} "+5": {} "+6": {}
Is there any workarounds to define the first DAG?
Now I consider the following DAG. (2, 3) and (4, 5) are executed in parallel, respectively.
As far as I thought, this DAG cannot be represented in a format of digdag. If it is modified as following, it can.
Is there any workarounds to define the first DAG?