Closed kwangshin closed 3 years ago
The CircleCI tests have been failed...
The --keyserver
has been changed, and new key server has "Host not found" error.
@treasure-data/integrations Could you please help to take a look?
Current Test Failure https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/treasure-data/td/36/workflows/1ff75fb0-4392-4d1c-9ace-8b78645f52e4/jobs/226
until gpg --keyserver hkp://ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys 409B6B1796C275462A1703113804BB82D39DC0E3 7D2BAF1CF37B13E2069D6956105BD0E739499BDB
......
gpg: requesting key D39DC0E3 from hkp server ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg: requesting key 39499BDB from hkp server ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net
?: ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found
gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Success
?: ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net: Host not found
gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Success
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
Previous PR with Test Success https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/treasure-data/td/35/workflows/f9aa4b38-4c99-461a-9410-133bfa03ed1a/jobs/221
until gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 409B6B1796C275462A1703113804BB82D39DC0E3 7D2BAF1CF37B13E2069D6956105BD0E739499BDB
@tung-vu-td Do you have any chance to review this PR? (As @kietdo360 requested a review to you. 😄 )
If it is merged, then usually how long does it take to release with new version? Do we have any upcoming plan for new version? (I'm sorry that I'm not familiar with release version strategy for this repository.)
Hi @kwangshin, The review will be fast since the PR is small. However let me look into the gpg keyserver failure as it need to be fixed in order for this PR to be merged. As for release, there is a release coming up soon.
The summary width of
--assume-role
option intable:export
help message is exceeding the current default value (32), so the help message for--assume-role
option is broken.To fix the broken help message for
--assume-role
option, we need to increase the summary width. From here, we increase the value to 36. After increasing the summary width, we can see the proper help message for--assume-role
option as the following: