Open glicalzi opened 8 months ago
H @glicalzi !
The mv_plot_topography
function relies on spatial interpolation of data across channels, which would be more complex with channels missing. I think the best to do is simply mark the missing channels, you can use the key 'mark_chans'
for it and you provide a vector where 1 signifies a marked channel. Currently channels are marked with a + but you can change l.151 to mark it in any other way.
Hope this information is useful (albeit late!)
Hello Matthias,
I've run a searchlight across channels and performed cluster-based permutation tests. When I use mv_plot_result, I get the following:
Instead, I would like something like the following but with non-significant electrodes masked out (or significant electrodes highlighted with stars like in FieldTrip)
This is the code I'm using:
stat_searchlight_animacy = mv_statistics(cfg_stat,result_searchlight_animacy);
average_searchlight_animacy = mv_combine_results(result_searchlight_animacy, 'average');
mv_plot_result(average_searchlight_animacy,'mask',stat_searchlight_animacy.mask),title('Animacy')
% mv_plot_topography(cfg_plot, [?], layout.pos);
Is there a way to plot the output of mv_statistics using mv_plot_topography?
Thank you!