tuple struct

[glepnir]

Hi thanks for this parser. for a tuple struct the tree looks like not correct

    struct Apple(i32);

    impl Phone for Apple {
        fn call(&self) -> Apple {
            Apple(10)
        }
    }

in tree it's function i know it's very special , is it possible to fix ?

[source_file](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [0, 4] - [8, 0]
  [struct_item](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [0, 4] - [0, 22]
    name: [type_identifier](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [0, 11] - [0, 16]
    body: [ordered_field_declaration_list](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [0, 16] - [0, 21]
      type: [primitive_type](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [0, 17] - [0, 20]
  [impl_item](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [2, 4] - [6, 5]
    trait: [type_identifier](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [2, 9] - [2, 14]
    type: [type_identifier](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [2, 19] - [2, 24]
    body: [declaration_list](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [2, 25] - [6, 5]
      [function_item](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 8] - [5, 9]
        name: [identifier](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 11] - [3, 15]
        parameters: [parameters](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 15] - [3, 22]
          [self_parameter](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 16] - [3, 21]
            [self](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 17] - [3, 21]
        return_type: [type_identifier](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 26] - [3, 31]
        body: [block](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [3, 32] - [5, 9]
          [call_expression](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [4, 12] - [4, 21]
            function: [identifier](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [4, 12] - [4, 17] -----Here!!!!
            arguments: [arguments](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [4, 17] - [4, 21]
              [integer_literal](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/playground#) [4, 18] - [4, 20]

[amaanq]

it's not really possible to fix here, but it's something queries can resolve with match regexes given the convention for tuple ctor identifiers (single identifier that is in PascalCase)

[glepnir]

but it also might be a function.call ? what did is change priority for function.call and variable. looks like this is not correct

(call_expression
  function: (identifier) @function.call
  (#lua-match? @type "^[A-Z]*$"))

[amaanq]

exactly, there's no real way to discern this - that's an LSP's job and the best one can do is make assumptions based on the ident's casing

Foo() is likely a tuple ctor, foo() a function call, make of that what you will but I could easily add that change to nvim-treesitter if desired

[glepnir]

right. simply change property for function.call and variable make them less than type will work.

[amaanq]

well you could just use "^[A-Z][a-z0-9_]*$" for tuple ctors