Open holdfenytolvaj opened 8 years ago
:+1:
I also like https://github.com/trentm/json
Using:
node index.js | bunyan -o json --strict | json -d ' -|- ' -ga module msg
I can get output similar to:
lib/middlewares/me.js -|- isUser
lib/middlewares/me.js -|- checkUserIdsMatch
lib/middlewares/me.js -|- checkUserIdsMatch - no match
lib/middlewares/domains.js -|- middlewares/domains res.send
lib/routes/github/index.js -|- proxying the request
Is there any interest in adding an output fields filter to the bunyan cli?
Thanks for the question.
@cflynn07 Heh, I like json
too (I wrote it :).
jq
is cool too. Yes, I think having some cookbook-type thing for Bunyan usage would be a good idea. I.e. examples of things one can do with it: with bunyan
, code usage patterns, with json
and jq
. However, that gets to the tipping point for having more than just the README for node-bunyan.
Anyway, a mention of json
and jq
in the rEADME would definitely be a good idea.
@cflynn07 About bunyan CLI options to filter fields: I think for your example use case above, I'd rather cut the call to bunyan
out of the picture and just have json
support not blowing up on non-JSON lines: https://github.com/trentm/json/issues/90
@trentm Yeah having JSON gracefully handle non-json lines would be great. +1
it might worth to mention on the front page that there is a nice tool to parse json output, so one can easily search/filter on the output...
https://stedolan.github.io/jq