cpt_warmup/binarycpt/home

[utterances-bot]

CPT Warmup Fin | Binary Logic

CPT Warmup Tangibles

https://trevorhuang1.github.io/cpt_warmup/binarycpt/home

[7mwang]

Individual Review Matthew Wang grading Aditya Desai

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. > 0.9

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute > 0.9
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives > 0.7
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions > 0.8

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks > 0.9

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

  Freeform comment.
  Provide positivies and growth summary.
  Justify or comment on final score.
  Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8. Video is complete, showcases site well, as well as having good subtitles to show the user what is happening

Plans could use a little work, more specific

Very good participation over the past couple weeks, very consistent. A lot of commits + key commits specified 0.9+0.9+0.9+0.8+0.7 = 4.2/5 = .84/.9

[7mwang]

Team Review Matthew Wang grading Trevor Huang

• [x] The team should have a Web Pages that teach: Binary, Data, Data Structures, Data Abstraction. > 0.9

Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions

• [x] Growth/Accomplishments in work is according to historical Team Plan, or they show revisions to plan according to work > 0.9
• [x] Short falls/Improvement that could be made in Work or Team Plan, team highlights next steps or improvements that could be made > 0.7
• [x] Showing key accomplishments according to requirement in Frontend such as Binary Math, ASCII, Unicode, Color Codes, Logic Gates, etc. > 0.9

• [x] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning. > 0.7 Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

  Team has a good collage of features that display knowledge of binary features and gives a good way to have user interaction.

User interaction could be improved, multiple features use image uploading, which isn't the most convenient

Site has a complete selection of features that include what was taught in binary lesson

Again, user interaction wasn't the most convenient, but still good

.9+.9+.9+.7+.7=.82/.9