cpt_warmup/binarycpt/home

[utterances-bot]

CPT Warmup Fin | Binary Logic

CPT Warmup Tangibles

https://trevorhuang1.github.io/cpt_warmup/binarycpt/home

[ak146]

Individual Review Andrew K grading Trevor Huang

• [0.9] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom: Trevor Huang showed consistent commits (about 1-2 per day) since before Thanksgiving break.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [0.8] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute. The video explained and detailed his project well. The captions were a bit too wordy and did not show key commits.
• [0.7] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives: Some issues that show responses to the Ideation but not as detailed.
• [0.9] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions: Showed me key contributions and explained how their team worked together.
• [0.9] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks: Trevor had about 1-2 commits per day since the break ended.

• 0.84

  Freeform comments: made good use of SASS animations in his project. His explanation also gave a good understanding and explanations as to why he converted binary in the way he did. His project was an idea that I had not thought about before. However, some of the text was hard to read. Some of the css could look a little bit nice but overall the program seemed to work well.

[KaydenLe]

Individual Review Kayden Le grading Hanlun Li

Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks Per check. 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Freeform comment. Provide positivies and growth summary. Justify or comment on final score. Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.

0.9 Code commits were consistant and meaningful to the project.

0.85 has consistant commits for the last 3 weeks. 0.85 Issues details key parts of his feature and additions he has added to the feature. 0.9 Issues showcase plans and details of the feature 0.9 Video is in captions giving a full demo and definitions of each part of his feature.

Overall: 0.88/0.9 (97.8)

Idea is cool Make user face better Add instructions I like how the interface goes with the theme but it could be cleaner.

[DavidL0914]

Individual Review David grading Matthew

• [0.9 - contributed to project with good partcipation] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [0.85 - Video has a clear demo and explains how to use feature with proper captions. Video is kind of blurry though.] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [0.7 - Good issue showing your plan for your feature but none that shows progress to team objectives. Could also expand on planning issue to be more specific.] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [0.9 - Good contributions to code with good and often commits] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
• [0.9 - Good and frequent commits showing consistent participation throughout the project] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

Overall Comments I like the idea behind your feature. I enjoy being able to see the sheep change colors based on different binary values I input, it helps me to visualize how each change to the binary value ends up changing the resulting RGB color. I like the idea of having random trips scroll through below the sheep. I also think it's cool that you added a "Generate Random Color" button.

I gave you a 0.85/0.9 because I like the idea behind your feature and the representation of RGB colors changing with each binary value I input. However, I think the CSS could be better and the page could be formatted neater and easier to navigate. I also think the "tips" bar is scrolling a bit too fast, so I can't finish reading a tip before a new one switches in. I also think you should add an instructions page to explain how RGB color codes work with binary values as well as how to use your feature effectively. I think if you have extra time you can also add some sort of fun feature, like for example you could make the sheep a certain color and then have the user try to input the three binary values for RGB colors to try to match the color of the sheep as closely as possible. Overall though, the idea behind your feature and the way you implement is still pretty good, it's just going above and beyond that you could work on!

[KaydenLe]

Individual Review Kayden Le grading Hanlun Li

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

  Freeform comment.
  Provide positivies and growth summary.
  Justify or comment on final score.
  Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.

[ak146]

Individual Review Andrew K grading Lakshanya

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

(0.85)

The idea works well. The video displayed the full ideation process and explained the final product well. However, when all the values are put on 255, the text disappears. You should make the text the inverse of the color instead of keeping it a constant value so that it always displays and is more dynamic.

[7mwang]

Individual Review Matthew Wang grading Aditya Desai

• [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. > 0.9Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [x] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute > 0.9

• [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives > 0.7

• [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions > 0.8

• [x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks > 0.9 Per check. 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond. Video is complete, showcases site well, as well as having good subtitles to show the user what is happening

Plans could use a little work, more specific Very good participation over the past couple weeks, very consistent. A lot of commits + key commits specified 0.9+0.9+0.9+0.8+0.7 = 4.2/5 = 0.84/0.9

[7mwang]

Team Review Matthew Wang grading Trevor Huang

• [x] The team should have a Web Pages that teach: Binary, Data, Data Structures, Data Abstraction. > 0.9 Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions

• [x] Growth/Accomplishments in work is according to historical Team Plan, or they show revisions to plan according to work > 0.9

• [x] Short falls/Improvement that could be made in Work or Team Plan, team highlights next steps or improvements that could be made > 0.7

• [x] Showing key accomplishments according to requirement in Frontend such as Binary Math, ASCII, Unicode, Color Codes, Logic Gates, etc. > 0.9

• [x] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Algorithms, Data, Data Structures. Or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning. > 0.7 Per check. 0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

Team has a good collage of features that display knowledge of binary features and gives a good way to have user interaction. User interaction could be improved, multiple features use image uploading, which isn't the most convenient

Site has a complete selection of features that include what was taught in binary lesson

Again, user interaction wasn't the most convenient, but still good

Plans could still be more clear, flow charts are quite basic .9+.9+.9+.7+.7=0.82/0.9