I have two 3060Ti LHR cards.
They do about 44 MH/s for ETH, I wanted to try out ERGO and was puzzled:
card #1: 130 MH/s
card #2: 80 MH/s (with very low power usage of ~80 W, which is strange, for ETH it has higher usage than the #1 - 130W).
So I wonder, maybe there is a bug with ERGO mining that omits the last card somehow?
I didn't notice auto LHR in this case, so tried also to give lhr-tune of 74 for both cards and got for both about 100 MH/s (lower for the #1 card, higher for #2, but the sum is about the same as without lhr-tune).
I doubt that the #2 is in some way inferior considering that for exact same OC values in ETH it gives similar results as #1, so I would expect similar for ERGO.
I also noticed simialr reports in other forums for 3060Ti LHR cards, that one goes into 80MH/s territory, so this is not an isolated case.
I have two 3060Ti LHR cards. They do about 44 MH/s for ETH, I wanted to try out ERGO and was puzzled: card #1: 130 MH/s card #2: 80 MH/s (with very low power usage of ~80 W, which is strange, for ETH it has higher usage than the #1 - 130W).
So I wonder, maybe there is a bug with ERGO mining that omits the last card somehow?
I didn't notice auto LHR in this case, so tried also to give lhr-tune of 74 for both cards and got for both about 100 MH/s (lower for the #1 card, higher for #2, but the sum is about the same as without lhr-tune).
I doubt that the #2 is in some way inferior considering that for exact same OC values in ETH it gives similar results as #1, so I would expect similar for ERGO.
I also noticed simialr reports in other forums for 3060Ti LHR cards, that one goes into 80MH/s territory, so this is not an isolated case.