Open obrusvit opened 6 months ago
Note on font_ttsatoshi_demibold_18/21.c
. Numerals (0
- 9
mapped to glyph indices 1298
-1307
as of #3954 . Done manually by modifying gen_font.py
as follows. A systematic solution would be better.
def _load_char(self, c: str) -> None:
glyph_map = {
'0': 1298,
'1': 1299,
'2': 1300,
'3': 1301,
'4': 1302,
'5': 1303,
'6': 1304,
'7': 1305,
'8': 1306,
'9': 1307,
}
if c in glyph_map:
self.face.load_glyph(glyph_map[c], freetype.FT_LOAD_RENDER | freetype.FT_LOAD_TARGET_NORMAL)
else:
self.face.load_char(c, freetype.FT_LOAD_RENDER | freetype.FT_LOAD_TARGET_NORMAL) # type: ignore
If we run
core/tools/codegen/gen_font.py
script, it creates a diff in generated font definitions. This is because of manual changes done to individual glyps for better visual appearance on certain models. The changes are documented by commentary but IMHO they should be defined in the script so that manual changes to generated code are not necessary.Changes are done to
font_unifont_regular_16
font_pixeloperatormono_regular_8
font_pixeloperator_regular_8
font_pixeloperator_bold_8
font_ttsatoshi_demibold_18.c
andfont_ttsatoshi_demibold_21.c
- alternative numeral glyphs usedfont_ttsatoshi_demibold_42.c
- uppercase fonts completely removed to save space - they are not used anywhere at the moment