Closed McCodeman closed 1 year ago
Can macOS trezord packaging be updated to include an arm variant and have home brew cask installation select this variant?
This is becoming more and more problematic with new Apple requirements for notarization.
I think it makes more sense to rewrite the Trezor Bridge cask so it builds the bridge from the source. Are you up for this task?
I think it makes more sense to rewrite the Trezor Bridge cask so it builds the bridge from the source. Are you up for this task?
Sure. Let me first attempt to build it locally on macOS.
When removing xgo for mac, I added also ARM support
https://github.com/trezor/trezord-go/pull/258
the notarization thing is not included
I have included notarization too. I am closing this as it's done in master
even when it's not yet released, but will be soon-ish.
Ah, the issue included homebrew too. Reopening.
Homebrew PR in https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/111672
Homebrew PR has been merged
Feature Request
I would like to run trezord independently as a native apple silicon (arm) process.
Problem
If I install
trezor-bridge
from the homebrew cask, an Intel compatible (using Rosetta) trezord process is started. If I run Trezor Suite w/o thetrezor-bridge
installed, a native apple silicon trezord process is started.Ask
I'd like to use Trezor with native apple silicon trezord process w/o having to launch Trezor Suite. Can macOS trezord packaging be updated to include an arm variant and have home brew cask installation select this variant?
Mitigation
I can use the Intel version until this becomes available or just launch Trezor Suite. I'm willing to help but very new to this project and may need some pointers on build and packaging process.
Thanks for creating a great product!