trezor / trezord-go

:smiling_imp: Trezor Communication Daemon (written in Go)
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
245 stars 148 forks source link

Two directly connected Trezors to macARM M1 are never detected #285

Open bosomt opened 2 years ago

bosomt commented 2 years ago

Describe the bug Two directly connected Trezors to mac M1 are never detected. This behavior is known since 03/2021 when we received our first M1 macbook. See last screenshot, even suite does not register that i connected T1 and disconnected TT, it still reports TT as connected. As new macARM architecture is replacing old Intel architecture maybe we can check and find reason for this behavior.

Problem can be solved by connecting one of devices to hub / usbC to usbMicro adapter does not help/ or by using Chrome and webUSB connection.

Firmware version and revision 2.5.2 , 2.5.3, 1.11.x

Desktop/smartphone setup (please complete the following information):

Screenshots

2x TT

Screenshot 2022-10-27 at 11 44 48

T1 and TT

image

Only T1 connected

image

2x TT - no bridge

Screenshot 2022-10-27 at 11 53 36
tsusanka commented 1 year ago

Not now, but in future it would be interesting to find out if this happens on your https://github.com/trezor/trezor-suite/pull/6509 branch. As @bosomt writes

Problem can be solved ... by using Chrome and webUSB connection.

so my guess is it will not happen there?

cc @mroz22

bosomt commented 1 year ago

tested on https://suite.corp.sldev.cz/suite-web/transport-refactor-2/web/ with standalone bridge 2.0.27 i only see one device connected maybe we can retest with app build ?

image
~/Downloads/trezorfwasuite/devkitfw  ioreg -p IOUSB                                                                                                   1 ✘  took 56s
+-o Root  <class IORegistryEntry, id 0x100000100, retain 29>
  +-o AppleT8103USBXHCI@00000000  <class AppleT8103USBXHCI, id 0x1000002c8, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (67248 ms), retain 84>
  | +-o TREZOR@00100000  <class IOUSBHostDevice, id 0x10003ac7c, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (19 ms), retain 23>
  +-o AppleT8103USBXHCI@01000000  <class AppleT8103USBXHCI, id 0x10000029b, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (50055 ms), retain 92>
    +-o TREZOR@01100000  <class IOUSBHostDevice, id 0x10003ac38, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (43 ms), retain 31>
tsusanka commented 1 year ago

Yes please try with desktop and Bridge turned off.

bosomt commented 1 year ago

same result with 2.0.32 + this branch binary :(

Info:

tsusanka commented 1 year ago

But that seems you are still using Bridge. And this branch it should not be needed. Maybe you have to set "nodeUSB" in debug settings?

bosomt commented 1 year ago

QA OK

NICE!

Info:

image
 ~  ioreg -p IOUSB                                                         ✔
+-o Root  <class IORegistryEntry, id 0x100000100, retain 29>
  +-o AppleT8103USBXHCI@00000000  <class AppleT8103USBXHCI, id 0x1000002c8, reg$
  | +-o TREZOR@00100000  <class IOUSBHostDevice, id 0x1000450da, registered, ma$
  +-o AppleT8103USBXHCI@01000000  <class AppleT8103USBXHCI, id 0x10000029b, reg$
    +-o TREZOR@01100000  <class IOUSBHostDevice, id 0x1000450c1, registered, ma$
tsusanka commented 1 year ago

Mega cool! cc @mroz22

@sime another reason to kill Bridge 😛.

matejkriz commented 1 year ago

I'm reopening because the bridge issue is not resolved. It works fine with NodeUSB and that just proves that it's a bridge bug and not macos.

MiroslavProchazka commented 11 months ago

Will be solved by introducing node usb transport as primary. @mroz22