Closed LienReyserhove closed 4 months ago
The unification process to generate the unified checklist already takes into account this situation: see https://github.com/trias-project/unified-checklist/blob/125d39928dcba73243454b95c0b1b338940103be/src/5_unify_information.Rmd#L70-L74.
So, I suggest to publish eventDate
as detailed as possible in the ad-hoc checklist.
At indicators level we work at year level, but we use the unified checklist, so no problems at all.
Great, thx for the feedback!
Date first observation
anddate last observation
includes information about the year a species was first/last observed. However, some records in the ad hoc checklist are very specific (e.g. this line) and report the day and month of the observation in that year. Should we allow this information in theeventDate
, right now expressed as a year rangeyyyy/yyyy
? I can image this has implications on the analyses further downstream (e.g. the unified checklist, indicators, etc.).@damianooldoni @timadriaens